Rk
1 Fresno 28 982 210 299 71 5 27 184 148 197 13 6 .304 .407 .469
1 Merced 28 978 215 313 62 8 18 183 89 179 35 9 .320 .398 .455
1 Reedley 28 1017 259 319 53 9 26 221 165 185 19 4 .314 .426 .460
1 Sequoias 28 1030 276 371 89 8 27 246 131 182 24 17 .360 .439 .541
1 Taft 28 878 86 202 26 5 8 70 100 207 13 8 .230 .326 .298
6 Porterville - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 West Hills Coalinga - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 28 30 11 10 461 103 18 210 268 .78 1181
1 Merced 28 47 15 13 445 88 7 240 232 1.03 1142
1 Reedley 28 46 17 9 468 88 26 236 266 .89 1254
1 Sequoias 28 27 17 12 557 124 17 238 232 1.03 1217
1 Taft 28 28 6 13 262 39 18 235 225 1.04 1025
6 Porterville - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
7 West Hills Coalinga - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
Rk
1 Fresno 28 239.2 273 192 137 112 245 9.20 13 5.14 -
1 Merced 28 232.0 276 213 168 134 224 8.69 23 6.52 -
1 Reedley 28 244.2 289 200 149 118 195 7.17 19 5.48 -
1 Sequoias 28 241.0 286 149 123 76 154 5.75 18 4.59 -
1 Taft 28 227.1 357 282 230 151 183 7.24 34 9.11 -
6 Porterville - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00 0.00
7 West Hills Coalinga - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00 -
Rk
1 Fresno 28 1011 718 246 47 .954 9 24 9 .273 7 0
1 Merced 28 987 699 232 56 .943 8 14 4 .222 43 1
1 Reedley 28 1069 734 279 56 .948 19 17 11 .393 8 0
1 Sequoias 28 1036 723 284 29 .972 21 14 8 .364 6 0
1 Taft 28 1008 683 264 61 .939 25 33 4 .108 7 1
6 Porterville - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
7 West Hills Coalinga - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 16 401 25
1 Merced 16 0 0
1 Reedley 15 721 49
1 Sequoias 14 0 0
1 Taft 13 485 37
6 Porterville - - -
7 West Hills Coalinga - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 24 846 180 256 62 5 25 161 122 168 10 6 .303 .402 .476
1 Merced 24 866 190 279 57 8 13 164 74 154 32 7 .322 .396 .452
1 Reedley 24 870 203 269 47 6 22 177 123 164 17 1 .309 .412 .453
1 Sequoias 24 883 226 302 78 5 23 200 106 165 19 13 .342 .419 .520
1 Taft 24 739 65 163 20 5 4 50 71 167 11 7 .221 .306 .277
6 Porterville - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
7 West Hills Coalinga - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 24 25 10 6 403 92 17 185 225 .82 1009
1 Merced 24 41 13 12 391 78 7 218 201 1.08 1006
1 Reedley 24 37 12 9 394 75 20 207 223 .93 1051
1 Sequoias 24 20 13 10 459 106 11 210 197 1.07 1032
1 Taft 24 22 4 12 205 29 15 206 194 1.06 848
6 Porterville - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
7 West Hills Coalinga - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
Rk
1 Fresno 24 203.2 234 167 118 98 201 8.88 10 5.21 -
1 Merced 24 202.0 241 173 138 113 194 8.64 21 6.15 -
1 Reedley 24 208.2 253 167 121 100 150 6.47 13 5.22 -
1 Sequoias 24 209.0 233 118 95 65 130 5.60 16 4.09 -
1 Taft 24 193.0 308 239 197 120 143 6.67 27 9.19 -
6 Porterville - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00 0.00
7 West Hills Coalinga - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00 -
Rk
1 Fresno 24 869 610 219 40 .954 7 19 8 .296 6 0
1 Merced 24 864 608 209 47 .946 8 12 3 .200 30 0
1 Reedley 24 918 626 246 46 .950 16 17 11 .393 7 0
1 Sequoias 24 903 627 250 26 .971 18 14 6 .300 4 0
1 Taft 24 864 580 231 53 .939 21 27 3 .100 6 1
6 Porterville - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
7 West Hills Coalinga - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 12 401 33
1 Merced 12 0 0
1 Reedley 12 721 61
1 Sequoias 12 0 0
1 Taft 11 380 35
6 Porterville - - -
7 West Hills Coalinga - - -