Rk
1 Fresno 40 1099 252 340 84 15 24 229 133 170 81 14 .309 .387 .479
2 Merced 38 977 179 277 50 12 4 162 114 184 31 11 .284 .368 .372
3 Porterville 36 947 168 296 56 10 9 152 111 133 46 4 .313 .389 .421
4 Reedley 30 738 120 200 36 5 3 95 70 101 39 9 .271 .341 .346
5 Sequoias 32 821 148 247 57 6 9 133 65 128 19 6 .301 .369 .418
6 Taft 37 948 134 249 37 8 3 105 93 138 31 11 .263 .337 .328
7 West Hills Coalinga - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 40 12 8 26 526 123 0 94 87 1.08 1278
2 Merced 38 22 9 6 363 66 0 141 207 .68 1128
3 Porterville 36 12 6 11 399 75 3 52 85 .61 1087
4 Reedley 30 11 5 10 255 44 6 105 114 .92 834
5 Sequoias 32 26 5 25 343 72 6 156 132 1.18 942
6 Taft 37 17 8 28 311 48 5 126 131 .96 1094
7 West Hills Coalinga - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
Rk
1 Fresno 40 271.2 261 124 110 122 160 4.12 11 2.83 -
2 Merced 38 238.0 274 208 170 96 147 4.32 13 5.00 -
2 Porterville 36 204.2 361 251 184 66 62 2.12 13 6.29 -
2 Reedley 30 181.2 317 201 148 66 63 2.43 16 5.70 -
2 Sequoias 32 190.1 258 215 172 119 97 3.57 12 6.33 -
2 Taft 37 234.0 347 224 159 91 154 4.61 11 4.76 -
2 West Hills Coalinga - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00 -
Rk
1 Fresno 40 1148 815 302 31 .973 13 27 16 .372 9 1
2 Merced 38 948 676 213 59 .938 4 73 5 .064 30 1
2 Porterville 36 995 633 282 80 .920 4 50 3 .057 31 1
2 Reedley 30 724 502 160 62 .914 9 33 7 .175 6 0
5 Sequoias 32 874 569 246 59 .932 5 85 7 .076 20 4
6 Taft 37 1033 702 253 78 .924 13 58 13 .183 19 0
7 West Hills Coalinga - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 20.0 0 0
2 Merced 19.0 0 0
2 Porterville 13.0 0 0
2 Reedley 13.0 763 59
5 Sequoias 13.0 650 50
6 Taft 16.0 - -
7 West Hills Coalinga - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 15 409 125 149 35 12 11 115 63 44 46 3 .364 .455 .589
2 Merced 16 453 102 154 29 8 4 95 39 55 16 5 .340 .402 .466
3 Porterville 15 380 73 115 28 3 3 65 58 54 20 1 .303 .402 .416
4 Reedley 15 386 49 94 17 2 1 38 31 55 23 6 .244 .308 .306
5 Sequoias 15 401 67 125 33 3 5 62 35 55 9 3 .312 .384 .446
6 Taft 15 372 42 84 15 2 2 35 30 58 12 6 .226 .291 .293
7 West Hills Coalinga - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 15 8 3 12 241 58 0 24 27 .89 495
2 Merced 16 12 6 3 211 41 0 68 101 .67 513
3 Porterville 15 8 4 3 158 34 0 11 28 .39 453
4 Reedley 15 6 2 6 118 20 3 59 64 .92 431
5 Sequoias 15 13 2 15 179 41 2 79 64 1.23 466
6 Taft 15 6 4 8 109 19 1 33 45 .73 420
7 West Hills Coalinga - - - - 0 0 - - - - 0
Rk
1 Fresno 15 95.2 72 28 26 41 62 4.54 3 1.90 -
2 Merced 16 106.2 92 60 49 43 87 5.71 1 3.22 -
2 Porterville 15 88.0 155 108 74 30 37 2.94 6 5.89 -
2 Reedley 15 94.0 162 107 84 44 23 1.71 9 6.26 -
2 Sequoias 15 95.1 116 85 70 58 51 3.74 4 5.14 -
2 Taft 15 99.0 126 68 50 33 62 4.38 3 3.54 -
2 West Hills Coalinga - 0.0 - - - - - .00 - 0.00 -
Rk
1 Fresno 15 394 287 97 10 .975 1 2 8 .800 1 1
2 Merced 16 439 320 97 22 .950 2 16 1 .059 10 0
3 Porterville 15 419 265 116 38 .909 3 26 1 .037 15 0
3 Reedley 15 408 282 96 30 .926 5 16 1 .059 4 0
3 Sequoias 15 414 284 108 22 .947 2 39 4 .093 7 0
3 Taft 15 444 297 118 29 .935 6 26 8 .235 6 0
3 West Hills Coalinga - 0 - - - - - - - - - -
Rk
1 Fresno 8.0 - -
2 Merced 8.0 0 0
3 Porterville 8.0 0 0
3 Reedley 5.0 421 85
5 Sequoias 7.0 350 50
6 Taft 8.0 - -
7 West Hills Coalinga - - -