Rk
1 Fresno 37 968 209 292 62 8 23 184 121 122 68 12 .302 .393 .454
2 Merced 38 957 159 249 47 16 6 137 81 182 34 7 .260 .329 .362
3 Porterville 36 823 134 222 49 3 3 125 83 144 22 6 .270 .342 .348
4 Reedley 38 1015 194 298 36 5 9 177 126 113 46 5 .294 .377 .366
5 Sequoias 38 1007 217 338 51 9 5 183 83 59 37 4 .336 .387 .419
6 Taft 32 747 103 192 28 4 6 91 50 118 11 4 .257 .311 .329
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 953 144 234 39 3 10 116 96 197 69 21 .246 .330 .324
Rk
1 Fresno 37 32 12 20 439 93 3 97 123 .79 1153
2 Merced 38 20 7 19 346 69 4 164 194 .85 1084
3 Porterville 36 10 5 10 286 55 2 80 68 1.18 931
4 Reedley 38 13 4 37 371 50 3 265 233 1.14 1195
5 Sequoias 38 9 11 45 422 65 7 201 261 .77 1155
6 Taft 32 10 4 11 246 38 6 190 168 1.13 822
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 28 9 8 309 52 3 110 110 1.00 1094
Rk
1 Fresno 37 241.0 206 94 76 117 161 4.68 4 2.21 1.34
2 Merced 38 241.2 203 93 56 55 154 4.46 5 1.62 1.07
3 Porterville 36 192.2 395 360 282 151 57 2.07 11 10.25 2.83
4 Reedley 38 253.1 270 148 113 98 186 5.14 7 3.12 1.45
5 Sequoias 38 240.1 163 54 43 63 254 7.40 1 1.25 0.94
6 Taft 32 168.2 391 360 277 111 41 1.70 23 11.50 2.98
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 237.2 372 299 219 129 83 2.44 13 6.45 2.11
Rk
1 Fresno 37 1005 720 254 31 .969 6 37 15 .288 12 0
2 Merced 38 925 683 191 51 .945 4 31 2 .061 7 0
2 Porterville 36 916 583 265 68 .926 3 77 2 .025 25 1
4 Reedley 38 1118 764 286 68 .939 6 24 8 .250 9 0
5 Sequoias 38 942 719 200 23 .976 6 28 6 .176 2 0
5 Taft 32 823 506 215 102 .876 4 71 8 .101 13 0
5 West Hills Coalinga 40 1046 703 265 78 .925 11 97 7 .067 35 0
Rk
1 Fresno 20.0 0 0
2 Merced 17.0 0 0
2 Porterville 18.0 0 0
2 Reedley 23.0 260 12
5 Sequoias 18.0 900 50
6 Taft 12.0 50 5
7 West Hills Coalinga 18.0 0 0
Rk
1 Fresno 18 449 113 140 33 6 11 100 62 54 38 5 .312 .413 .486
2 Merced 18 461 88 125 21 7 3 78 51 80 16 4 .271 .349 .367
3 Porterville 18 413 88 109 26 3 3 81 51 73 12 3 .264 .350 .363
4 Reedley 18 465 101 148 20 2 4 95 71 52 21 3 .318 .418 .396
5 Sequoias 18 463 119 170 27 5 4 107 39 31 17 2 .367 .414 .473
6 Taft 18 393 42 93 15 1 5 37 27 70 6 1 .237 .289 .318
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 415 70 98 14 2 5 59 40 98 26 11 .236 .325 .316
Rk
1 Fresno 18 21 8 11 218 50 0 34 45 .76 551
2 Merced 18 6 3 8 169 31 2 75 101 .74 529
3 Porterville 18 6 4 9 150 32 0 21 29 .72 483
4 Reedley 18 10 2 20 184 26 3 81 86 .94 568
5 Sequoias 18 4 8 22 219 36 1 74 108 .69 536
6 Taft 18 3 2 3 125 21 2 73 90 .81 428
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 16 3 6 131 21 0 37 40 .93 480
Rk
1 Fresno 18 111.0 64 24 20 59 80 5.05 1 1.26 1.11
2 Merced 18 113.1 77 24 16 24 65 4.01 3 0.99 0.89
3 Porterville 18 99.1 201 176 134 69 28 1.97 6 9.44 2.72
4 Reedley 18 112.0 112 53 42 34 91 5.69 5 2.63 1.30
5 Sequoias 18 106.2 63 9 9 27 132 8.66 0 0.59 0.84
6 Taft 18 93.1 203 207 164 74 22 1.65 14 12.30 2.97
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 101.1 165 130 89 55 38 2.63 6 6.15 2.17
Rk
1 Fresno 18 472 333 126 13 .972 5 9 10 .526 4 0
2 Merced 18 446 340 85 21 .953 3 6 2 .250 3 0
2 Porterville 18 468 294 139 35 .925 2 34 1 .029 12 0
2 Reedley 18 487 341 121 25 .949 3 5 5 .500 5 0
2 Sequoias 18 410 319 85 6 .985 2 8 3 .273 0 0
2 Taft 18 450 280 109 61 .864 1 43 5 .104 4 0
2 West Hills Coalinga 18 453 301 115 37 .918 4 31 1 .031 11 0
Rk
1 Fresno 10.0 0 0
2 Merced 9.0 0 0
2 Porterville 10.0 0 0
2 Reedley 8.0 0 0
2 Sequoias 9.0 450 50
6 Taft 10.0 50 5
7 West Hills Coalinga 7.0 - -