Rk
1 Fresno 37 992 225 305 72 6 20 189 107 108 52 5 .307 .382 .453
2 Merced 37 1030 190 306 46 11 13 157 79 92 27 7 .297 .358 .401
3 Porterville 32 849 126 225 43 5 3 107 111 132 9 4 .265 .366 .338
4 Reedley 37 969 161 238 34 11 10 131 76 142 34 11 .246 .316 .334
5 Sequoias 37 1015 200 318 42 8 4 149 86 95 68 6 .313 .379 .382
6 Taft 39 1106 223 343 55 5 12 184 64 101 71 8 .310 .364 .401
7 West Hills Coalinga 32 778 104 178 20 4 3 83 78 114 3 2 .229 .313 .276
Rk
1 Fresno 37 16 6 34 449 98 4 106 101 1.05 1155
2 Merced 37 24 8 12 413 70 11 231 269 .86 1153
3 Porterville 32 28 7 21 287 51 6 103 90 1.14 1016
4 Reedley 37 28 10 27 324 55 18 163 118 1.38 1110
5 Sequoias 37 27 8 59 388 54 3 225 163 1.38 1195
6 Taft 39 37 14 33 444 72 1 56 26 2.15 1254
7 West Hills Coalinga 32 18 1 25 215 27 1 64 34 1.88 900
Rk
1 Fresno 37 233.2 321 189 148 83 69 2.07 30 4.43 1.73
2 Merced 37 245.1 219 136 90 91 220 6.28 7 2.57 1.26
3 Porterville 32 199.1 303 191 137 63 69 2.42 2 4.81 -
4 Reedley 37 230.2 294 204 131 91 45 1.37 11 3.98 1.67
5 Sequoias 37 252.0 257 162 91 94 133 3.69 11 2.53 1.39
6 Taft 39 259.0 296 191 127 97 85 2.30 17 3.43 1.52
7 West Hills Coalinga 32 189.2 327 214 157 52 58 2.14 15 5.79 2.00
Rk
1 Fresno 37 1120 704 361 55 .951 17 21 8 .276 3 2
2 Merced 37 1060 734 257 69 .935 10 35 8 .186 11 0
3 Porterville 32 887 565 247 75 .915 9 54 2 .036 14 0
3 Reedley 37 892 547 289 56 .937 10 44 4 .083 12 0
3 Sequoias 37 1182 738 346 98 .917 6 38 6 .136 13 0
3 Taft 39 1228 763 381 84 .932 19 39 13 .250 17 0
3 West Hills Coalinga 32 789 528 193 68 .914 14 44 4 .083 28 0
Rk
1 Fresno 18.0 50 3
2 Merced 20.0 0 0
3 Porterville 8.0 0 0
3 Reedley 14.0 735 53
5 Sequoias 24.0 900 38
6 Taft 16.0 - -
7 West Hills Coalinga 15.0 0 0
Rk
1 Fresno 18 487 98 144 37 3 9 82 45 48 28 1 .296 .359 .439
2 Merced 20 553 104 170 27 6 11 90 32 39 15 5 .307 .351 .438
3 Porterville 18 478 67 128 25 3 3 57 58 72 2 1 .268 .356 .351
4 Reedley 19 511 97 137 19 5 9 79 36 69 14 6 .268 .329 .378
5 Sequoias 18 519 99 172 27 3 1 77 36 30 32 3 .331 .389 .401
6 Taft 18 538 118 182 25 2 9 94 37 48 41 7 .338 .397 .442
7 West Hills Coalinga 19 480 79 121 12 2 2 65 48 52 2 2 .252 .332 .298
Rk
1 Fresno 18 5 3 20 214 49 4 65 65 1.00 560
2 Merced 20 7 3 7 242 44 6 110 133 .83 602
3 Porterville 18 10 4 11 168 31 2 38 32 1.19 561
4 Reedley 19 14 7 17 193 33 14 63 66 .95 585
5 Sequoias 18 15 4 32 208 31 - 110 87 1.26 606
6 Taft 18 21 8 18 238 36 - 0 - - 622
7 West Hills Coalinga 19 10 1 12 143 16 - 20 13 1.54 551
Rk
1 Fresno 18 116.2 154 79 57 38 28 1.68 12 3.42 1.65
2 Merced 20 129.1 98 46 37 43 120 6.49 2 2.00 1.09
3 Porterville 18 114.2 180 106 74 34 29 1.77 2 4.52 -
4 Reedley 19 116.2 155 110 74 50 25 1.50 5 4.44 1.76
5 Sequoias 18 125.0 119 72 39 54 72 4.03 5 2.18 1.38
6 Taft 18 123.0 115 65 40 36 41 2.33 6 2.28 1.23
7 West Hills Coalinga 19 113.1 181 115 76 34 40 2.47 7 4.69 1.90
Rk
1 Fresno 18 553 350 175 28 .949 8 10 4 .286 2 1
2 Merced 20 532 388 119 25 .953 7 13 1 .071 7 0
3 Porterville 18 472 305 125 42 .911 8 31 1 .031 7 0
3 Reedley 19 492 293 164 35 .929 6 21 3 .125 6 0
3 Sequoias 18 591 375 166 50 .915 4 14 6 .300 5 0
3 Taft 18 575 368 170 37 .936 10 11 2 .154 2 0
3 West Hills Coalinga 19 459 310 106 43 .906 10 32 3 .086 16 0
Rk
1 Fresno 8.0 50 7
2 Merced 10.0 0 0
3 Porterville 7.0 0 0
3 Reedley 10.0 385 39
5 Sequoias 10.0 400 40
6 Taft 8.0 - -
7 West Hills Coalinga 11.0 - -