Rk
1 Fresno 21 579 145 195 46 4 19 121 58 58 21 3 .337 .404 .528
2 Merced 20 504 89 135 23 8 6 73 64 63 22 3 .268 .349 .381
3 Porterville 20 498 112 151 24 4 18 96 73 85 12 3 .303 .397 .476
4 Reedley 25 655 129 188 27 3 1 99 58 63 69 7 .287 .351 .342
5 Sequoias 23 625 149 205 29 15 5 124 33 44 6 4 .328 .367 .446
6 Taft 18 420 61 109 16 4 1 47 25 91 25 7 .260 .301 .324
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 370 37 75 16 1 1 29 25 78 12 1 .203 .257 .259
Rk
1 Fresno 21 9 2 9 306 69 3 49 52 .94 657
2 Merced 20 4 10 5 192 37 1 88 107 .82 587
3 Porterville 20 5 1 10 237 46 2 41 46 .89 587
3 Reedley 25 9 5 29 224 31 10 170 130 1.31 756
5 Sequoias 23 10 8 27 279 49 5 115 127 .91 703
6 Taft 18 0 0 0 136 21 1 41 46 .89 445
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 2 - 2 96 18 2 44 28 1.57 399
Rk
1 Fresno 21 121.0 167 109 67 62 56 3.24 14 3.88 1.89
2 Merced 20 120.2 158 106 74 22 75 4.35 2 4.29 1.49
3 Porterville 20 114.2 200 180 117 66 28 1.71 7 7.14 -
4 Reedley 25 158.0 214 138 105 49 57 2.53 20 4.65 1.66
5 Sequoias 23 145.2 145 87 76 35 148 7.11 7 3.65 1.24
6 Taft 18 83.0 249 237 143 60 60 5.06 7 12.06 -
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 95.1 210 242 134 106 35 2.57 12 9.84 -
Rk
1 Fresno 21 558 348 181 29 .948 10 18 2 .100 3 0
2 Merced 20 518 359 120 39 .925 2 30 4 .118 9 0
2 Porterville 20 596 340 194 62 .896 1 38 1 .026 13 0
2 Reedley 25 706 487 177 42 .941 6 12 4 .250 1 0
2 Sequoias 23 577 432 118 27 .953 3 26 2 .071 1 0
2 Taft 18 411 250 88 73 .822 2 50 2 .038 42 0
2 West Hills Coalinga 18 554 254 239 61 .890 - 84 - - 9 -
Rk
1 Fresno 7.0 - -
2 Merced 8.0 0 0
3 Porterville 8.0 0 0
3 Reedley 13.0 1,054 82
5 Sequoias 12.0 550 46
6 Taft 10.0 0 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 10.0 0 0
Rk
1 Fresno 6 175 52 65 18 0 5 36 13 13 13 0 .371 .424 .560
2 Merced 6 166 56 63 12 7 4 43 19 17 17 1 .380 .432 .608
3 Porterville 5 129 28 29 5 1 7 23 26 27 2 0 .225 .355 .442
4 Reedley 7 188 57 63 13 - - 43 16 16 35 4 .335 .391 .404
5 Sequoias 4 111 36 44 5 2 3 28 4 3 0 0 .396 .412 .559
6 Taft 6 127 10 28 4 0 0 5 7 37 2 3 .220 .261 .252
7 West Hills Coalinga 6 119 3 15 2 1 - 4 10 24 1 - .126 .194 .160
Rk
1 Fresno 6 3 0 6 98 23 1 7 12 .58 197
2 Merced 6 1 6 2 101 23 - 11 32 .34 194
3 Porterville 5 0 0 3 57 13 - 5 18 .28 158
4 Reedley 7 2 1 6 76 13 1 45 26 1.73 213
5 Sequoias 4 1 3 8 62 10 1 22 23 .96 127
6 Taft 6 0 0 0 32 4 1 11 16 .69 134
7 West Hills Coalinga 6 - - - 19 3 - 11 13 .85 129
Rk
1 Fresno 6 37.0 31 15 8 18 25 4.73 5 1.51 1.32
2 Merced 6 33.0 34 20 10 7 33 7.00 0 2.12 1.24
3 Porterville 5 33.0 37 25 12 8 5 1.06 2 2.55 -
4 Reedley 7 43.0 42 26 17 18 20 3.26 5 2.77 1.40
5 Sequoias 4 24.0 22 5 4 2 21 6.13 1 1.17 1.00
6 Taft 6 28.2 62 70 42 21 20 4.88 2 10.26 -
7 West Hills Coalinga 6 32.2 82 82 53 21 12 2.57 4 11.36 -
Rk
1 Fresno 6 190 114 72 4 .979 3 3 2 .400 0 0
2 Merced 6 142 99 33 10 .930 1 5 2 .286 2 0
2 Porterville 5 184 97 72 15 .918 0 4 0 .000 4 0
2 Reedley 7 217 135 70 12 .945 2 - 1 1.000 - -
5 Sequoias 4 93 71 18 4 .957 1 4 0 .000 0 0
6 Taft 6 149 86 34 29 .805 0 22 0 .000 25 0
6 West Hills Coalinga 6 246 115 109 22 .911 - 32 - - 6 -
Rk
1 Fresno 4.0 - -
2 Merced 2.0 0 0
3 Porterville 1 0 0
3 Reedley 5.0 382 77
5 Sequoias 2.0 50 25
6 Taft 2.0 - -
7 West Hills Coalinga 4.0 0 0