Rk
1 Sequoias 40 1063 227 351 53 10 5 192 90 60 40 4 .330 .383 .413
2 Fresno 39 1023 222 312 66 9 25 191 123 124 72 12 .305 .392 .460
3 Reedley 41 1085 201 312 36 6 10 184 133 120 46 6 .288 .371 .359
4 Porterville 36 823 134 222 49 3 3 125 83 144 22 6 .270 .342 .348
5 Taft 32 747 103 192 28 4 6 91 50 118 11 4 .257 .311 .329
6 Merced 40 1000 162 256 48 16 6 140 86 194 34 7 .256 .325 .354
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 953 144 234 39 3 10 116 96 197 69 21 .246 .330 .324
Rk
1 Sequoias 40 9 13 46 439 68 8 221 281 .79 1221
2 Fresno 39 32 12 22 471 100 3 97 123 .79 1212
3 Reedley 41 13 4 38 390 52 3 270 241 1.12 1273
4 Porterville 36 10 5 10 286 55 2 80 68 1.18 931
5 Taft 32 10 4 11 246 38 6 190 168 1.13 822
6 Merced 40 21 9 20 354 70 4 184 200 .92 1136
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 28 9 8 309 52 3 110 110 1.00 1094
Rk
1 Sequoias 40 253.1 180 69 51 70 263 7.27 4 1.41 0.99
2 Fresno 39 255.0 217 99 78 126 164 4.50 4 2.14 1.35
3 Reedley 41 266.0 290 159 123 99 200 5.26 7 3.24 1.46
4 Porterville 36 192.2 395 360 282 151 57 2.07 11 10.25 2.83
5 Taft 32 168.2 391 360 277 111 41 1.70 23 11.50 2.98
6 Merced 40 253.2 228 113 73 60 156 4.30 6 2.01 1.14
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 237.2 372 299 219 129 83 2.44 13 6.45 2.11
Rk
1 Sequoias 40 1002 758 216 28 .972 7 30 6 .167 2 0
2 Fresno 39 1064 762 268 34 .968 6 37 15 .288 13 0
3 Reedley 41 1199 823 307 69 .942 6 27 8 .229 13 0
4 Porterville 36 916 583 265 68 .926 3 77 2 .025 25 1
5 Taft 32 823 506 215 102 .876 4 71 8 .101 13 0
6 Merced 40 984 719 207 58 .941 4 35 2 .054 10 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 40 1046 703 265 78 .925 11 97 7 .067 35 0
Rk
1 Sequoias 20.0 1,100 55
2 Fresno 22.0 0 0
3 Reedley 24.0 260 11
4 Porterville 18.0 0 0
5 Taft 12.0 50 5
6 Merced 18.0 0 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 18.0 0 0
Rk
1 Sequoias 18 463 119 170 27 5 4 107 39 31 17 2 .367 .414 .473
2 Fresno 18 449 113 140 33 6 11 100 62 54 38 5 .312 .413 .486
3 Reedley 18 465 101 148 20 2 4 95 71 52 21 3 .318 .418 .396
4 Porterville 18 413 88 109 26 3 3 81 51 73 12 3 .264 .350 .363
5 Taft 18 393 42 93 15 1 5 37 27 70 6 1 .237 .289 .318
6 Merced 18 461 88 125 21 7 3 78 51 80 16 4 .271 .349 .367
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 415 70 98 14 2 5 59 40 98 26 11 .236 .325 .316
Rk
1 Sequoias 18 4 8 22 219 36 1 74 108 .69 536
2 Fresno 18 21 8 11 218 50 0 34 45 .76 551
3 Reedley 18 10 2 20 184 26 3 81 86 .94 568
4 Porterville 18 6 4 9 150 32 0 21 29 .72 483
5 Taft 18 3 2 3 125 21 2 73 90 .81 428
6 Merced 18 6 3 8 169 31 2 75 101 .74 529
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 16 3 6 131 21 0 37 40 .93 480
Rk
1 Sequoias 18 106.2 63 9 9 27 132 8.66 0 0.59 0.84
2 Fresno 18 111.0 64 24 20 59 80 5.05 1 1.26 1.11
3 Reedley 18 112.0 112 53 42 34 91 5.69 5 2.63 1.30
4 Porterville 18 99.1 201 176 134 69 28 1.97 6 9.44 2.72
5 Taft 18 93.1 203 207 164 74 22 1.65 14 12.30 2.97
6 Merced 18 113.1 77 24 16 24 65 4.01 3 0.99 0.89
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 101.1 165 130 89 55 38 2.63 6 6.15 2.17
Rk
1 Sequoias 18 410 319 85 6 .985 2 8 3 .273 0 0
2 Fresno 18 472 333 126 13 .972 5 9 10 .526 4 0
3 Reedley 18 487 341 121 25 .949 3 5 5 .500 5 0
4 Porterville 18 468 294 139 35 .925 2 34 1 .029 12 0
5 Taft 18 450 280 109 61 .864 1 43 5 .104 4 0
6 Merced 18 446 340 85 21 .953 3 6 2 .250 3 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 18 453 301 115 37 .918 4 31 1 .031 11 0
Rk
1 Sequoias 9.0 450 50
2 Fresno 10.0 0 0
3 Reedley 8.0 0 0
4 Porterville 10.0 0 0
5 Taft 10.0 50 5
6 Merced 9.0 0 0
7 West Hills Coalinga 7.0 - -